Digital transformation of notified bodies
The digital transformation of notified bodies will transform the medical device ecosystem over the next few years. This article describes
The “regulatory affairs” section comprises over 200 tasks that need to be completed during the development and approval of medical devices.
Here, you will find an overview of the most essential content so that you can get your device approved quickly.

Content
On this page, you will find articles on the following topics:
Regulatory affairs comprises the processes and activities that ensure that medical devices meet the regulatory requirements of the countries where they are sold. This includes
The tasks of regulatory affairs also include monitoring changes to regulations and standards and communicating these changes to stakeholders within the company to ensure continuous compliance.
Regulatory affairs thus plays a crucial role in ensuring that medical devices are safe, effective, and comply with legal requirements.
Refer also to the article on regulatory affairs managers’ tasks, competencies, and earning potential. This includes the task of developing a regulatory strategy.
| Laws | Medical Devices Law (no longer valid)
Medical Devices Implementation Act MPDG |
| National regulations | Medical Device Operator Ordinance (Medizinprodukte-Betreiberverordnung – MPBetreibV)
Medical Device User Notification and Information Ordinance (Medizinprodukte-Anwendermelde- und Informationsverordnung – MPAMIV) |
| EU directives (only for existing devices) | Medical Device Directive (MDD, 93/42/EEC) and its essential requirements |
| EU regulations | Medical Device Regulation MDR
In-Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) AI Regulation (planned) EU AI Act |
| EU guidelines | Overview of MDCG documents
Examples
|
| Harmonized standards | Overview of harmonized standards. You will find further articles on specific standards and their implementation (also) in these categories:
|
| Laws | Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FD&C)
Administrative Laws (21 CFR)
|
| General information | Request for Information: How the FDA helps with classification
FDA eCopy Program FDA Warning Letters and FDA Form 483 (Form 483) Software Change: What the FDA expects from you |
| Approval procedure | FDA updates “Refuse to Accept Policy” for 510(k)
The FDA Pre-Submission Program The FDA Software Precertification (Pre-Cert) Pilot Program FDA’s De Novo Program Level of Concern: What the FDA wants to achieve with this program Special 510(k): When the FDA will allow this “shortcut” Breakthrough Devices Program of the FDA |
| Requirements | FDA Human Factors Guidances
The FDA QSIT: Quality System Inspection Technique The FDA Benefit-Risk Guidance Recognized Consensus Standards of the FDA Guidance ‘Interoperable Medical Devices’ |
| see section 3.a) |
| Approval of medical devices (overview) Please also note the presentation describing the path to the CE mark as well as the articles “7 steps to a medical device” and “Approval of IVDs.“ |
| Conformity assessment procedure (assessing conformity with statutory requirements) |
| Approval in China |
| Approval China FDA / NMPA |
| Approval in Brazil |
| Approval in Japan |
| Approval Saudi Arabia (SFDA) |
| Approval South Korea |
Find more information on international approval
| Qualification as a medical device (medical device yes/no). This also includes the distinction between medicinal products and medical devices, as well as the special case of combination products. |
| Classification according to MDR Class I, IIa, IIb, III or IVDR Class A, B, C and D |
| Qualification and classification of software as a medical device |
| Classification of devices as accessories and as commodity/trade goods |
| Technical documentation (overview) |
| Intended purpose (the foundation document) |
| Instructions for use |
| Clinical evaluation of medical devices according to MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev. 4 |
| Risk management files: risk policy, risk management plan, risk analysis, risk management report |
| Usability file |
| Software file, e.g., software requirements specification, software architecture, software tests, software release. Please also note the special features of medical apps (mobile medical apps). |
| Verification and validation of medical devices |
| Unique Device Identification |
Quality management is not usually the responsibility of regulatory affairs. Nevertheless, we have listed some important articles for you.
| Steps to a certified QM system |
| Audits (especially of quality management systems) |
| Systems for Post-Market Surveillance and PMCF (Post-Market Clinical Follow-up) and vigilance |
There are several expert articles on regulatory roles:
| Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM – Bundesamt für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte) |
| German Institute for Medical Informatics (DIMDI – Deutsches Institut für medizinische Informatik); has since been integrated into the BfArM |
| DAkkS, the German accreditation body |
| State authorities: Regional councils, trade supervisory offices, governments |
| Notified bodies |
| NBOG: Notified Body Operations Group |
| MDCG: Medical Device Coordination Group |
| IMDRF: International Medical Device Regulators Forum |
The tasks of Regulatory Affairs also include finding and eliminating deviations and non-conformities. The (emergency) elimination is called remediation.
Note the advantages and disadvantages of Regulatory Information Management Systems (RIMS) and their role in manufacturers’ digital transformation.
Part of the tasks of regulatory affairs is regulatory intelligence.
Do you need support?
Do you still have questions, for example, about the approval of your devices? Then, take advantage of our free micro-consulting service.
If you would like support in developing and “approving” your medical devices in compliance with the law, contact us right away. The Johner Institute team will be happy to help!
The digital transformation of notified bodies will transform the medical device ecosystem over the next few years. This article describes
The Medical Device Coordination Group (MDCG) is an expert panel required by the MDR and IVDR. The MDCG is sometimes confused with another coordination group or with expert panels. You can find out how these groups are differentiated here. Read this article to find out how you are affected by the output of the MDCG’s…
DetailsRegulators still publish laws and regulations as texts. Just as it has been for thousands of years. Regulation as Code represents a radical paradigm shift away from this practice. Is it possible to transform laws into algorithms? Why should anyone want to do this? How should you get ready for this as a regulator, manufacturer, authority, or…
DetailsDecision Support Systems are also increasingly being used in medicine. If they are medical devices, they must meet the legal requirements (e.g., the general safety and performance requirements). The hype surrounding Artificial Intelligence, in particular Machine Learning, and users such as Watson are raising hopes for the performance of Decision Support Systems. This article presents…
DetailsFrom 2017-2022 the FDA offered a “Precertification (Pre-Cert) Pilot Program” to specific companies for standalone software to simplify and accelerate the approval process for digital health devices. This article summarizes the most important aspects and provides a quick overview.
DetailsIf manufacturers don’t conduct a legally compliant performance evaluation of their in vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD), they aren’t just running the risk of problems during the authorization process: They are risking patient safety. Therefore, the IVDR sets strict requirements for this performance evaluation. Find out how the requirements of the IVDR for the performance…
DetailsIf a medical device does not (or no longer) meets the FDA’s requirements, manufacturers, distributors, and importers must recall it. This applies in particular if the device presents a hazard. In this article you will learn,
DetailsCytotoxicity testing can be used to test a sample to determine how much it can damage, or even cause the death of, human cells. Standards and legislation require manufacturers to demonstrate that their devices are not cytotoxic. With a good test setup, it is possible to detect whether a sample is 100% cytotoxic, i.e., highly cytotoxic, or…
DetailsThe 510(k), also known as “Premarket Notification”, is one of the most common procedures for the authorization of medical devices in the USA. The concept is based on demonstrating equivalence with a predicate device (equivalent device). But the same mistakes, which can result in the entire 510(k) authorization failing, are made time and again. It…
DetailsPost-Market Surveillance (PMS) is a proactive and systematic process to derive necessary corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) from information about medical devices already placed on the market. We have created a Post-Market Surveillance checklist for you. With this checklist, you can find out whether you meet the regulatory requirements of the MDR for Post-Market Surveillance…
Details