Many laws and standards require validation. However, these regulations define the term differently in various contexts.
Content
This article provides a quick overview and links to practical tips in further articles:
ISO 9000 defines the term validation as follows:
Confirmation by objective evidence that the requirements for a specific application or intended purpose have been met
As the term requirement is interpreted differently, this definition is helpful:
Confirmation by objective means of whether specified users achieve the specified objectives in the specified context of use
The article on verification and validation of medical devices provides a quick introduction to the topic.
The definitions do not determine which objects are validated. In the context of medical devices, these are, for example
For medical devices, validation occurs at the end of development (see Fig. 1). This applies not only to the V-model but to every development process.
Fig. 1: Validation takes place at the end of the development process.
This is referred to as design validation.
It must ensure that the stakeholders’ requirements are met and that the users achieve the intended purpose (see dashed red arrow in Fig. 1).
The most important methods in the validation of medical devices are clinical evaluation and usability validation, e.g., in the form of a summative evaluation or usability tests.
In the V&V of IVDs, the performance evaluation corresponds to the clinical evaluation.
Some manufacturers also include tests in test laboratories, such as biocompatibility tests (e.g., cytotoxicity tests) and electrical safety tests in validation. But these tend to be verification activities.
The term “validation” is also used in the context of components, such as machine learning libraries. However, these tend to be verification activities in the regulatory sense.
All important standards and laws require the validation of medical devices. These include:
ISO 13485 counts clinical evaluation as part of validation.
These notes on the clinical evaluation of software are helpful.
In its guidance, General Principles of Software Validation, the FDA describes software quality management rather than software validation.
In several instances, ISO 13485 requires manufacturers to validate their infrastructure and tools. Chapter 4.1.6, for example, obliges manufacturers to perform Computerized Systems Validation (CSV). Standards such as ISO 80002-2 and AMII TIR 36 assist with this.
This article describes the exact requirements of the standard for tool validation.
Laws and standards such as the MDR, IVDR, and ISO 13485 also oblige manufacturers to validate processes. All processes that have an impact on the conformity of the devices must be validated. These are not only development and production processes but also processes for dealing with customer feedback and post-market surveillance.
Do you still have questions about the validation of medical devices, computerized systems, and processes? Our free micro-consulting will provide you with answers.
You will learn how to validate processes in the internal auditor seminar and the certified auditor course. The computerized systems validation seminar provides you with all the knowledge you need to carry out CSV yourself.
A usability validation in the Johner Institute’s usability labs ensures the conformity and usability of your devices.
Contact us here if you would like support in determining and verifying all relevant requirements quickly, easily, and in compliance with the law. We will help you avoid hassle and delays in the approval process and quickly get your devices onto the market.
In this article, you will learn about the requirements that the FDA places on human factors engineering (HFE), the products to which the FDA applies these requirements, and how you can implement these requirements.
Many companies confuse “user experience” with “usability,” which leads to confusion not only during audits. This article distinguishes between the two terms and reveals how you can test both.
The correct and precise formulation of the intended purpose of medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD) is crucial for their successful development and approval. However, even the definitions of terms and the distinction between intended purpose and intended use make it difficult to achieve clarity and precision. This article reveals how to…
DetailsA usability lab is a facility where usability experts can simulate user environments to review the usability of products using usability tests. This involves asking test subjects (test participants) to complete tasks using these products. In this article, you will learn
DetailsThe NMPA Usability Guidance affects many manufacturers of medical devices and IVDs, as well as manufacturers of combination products, who want to market their products in China. This article clarifies which devices must comply with the NMPA requirements regarding usability and what these requirements are.
DetailsMost medical device manufacturers associate the term “design validation” with the FDA. However, not only the FDA but also European regulations, particularly ISO 13485, require design and development validation. Nevertheless, design validation and validation of the design should not be confused. This article shows how the two differ and which regulatory requirements must be observed.
DetailsAQL stands for Acceptable Quality Level and is sometimes translated as “permitted reject rate.” The AQL determines when a batch of parts or products is rejected or accepted based on a random sample inspection. However, auditors regularly no longer accept the AQL. What to do? This article provides answers.
DetailsWhat is the difference between verification and validation, and how are these terms defined? Even standards and regulations use the terms incorrectly or misleadingly. This article
DetailsThe term summative evaluation can be translated as “final evaluation.” A summative evaluation checks at the end of the development phase whether users can operate a device or a user interface safely. This article provides an overview of the regulatory requirements for the “summative evaluation” (sometimes also referred to as “summative assessment“) and gives you…
DetailsGLP (Good Laboratory Practice) defines requirements for a quality assurance system for non-clinical health and environmental safety tests. It also describes the organizational procedure and conditions under which laboratory tests are planned, carried out, and monitored. GLP also covers the record and reporting of. In this article, you can read which requirements medical device manufacturers…
Details