The EU medical device regulations (MDR and IVDR) refer to the requirements that every medical device must meet as General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR).
The previous Medical Device Directive (MDD) referred to the “general requirements”.
Content
On this page, you will find references to relevant articles.
- Examples of General Safety and Performance Requirements
- Proof of the General Safety and Performance Requirements
- Differences between the requirements of the MDR and the MDD
- Support in demonstrating these requirements
1. Examples of General Safety and Performance Requirements
The MDR and IVDR list the General Safety and Performance Requirements in their respective Annexes I. Examples of GSPR are:
Note
The GSPR do not depend on the class of the medical device.
2. Proof of the general requirements
The manufacturers themselves provide proof that the medical devices meet these general requirements as part of a conformity assessment procedure. Depending on this conformity assessment procedure, they have to involve notified bodies.
Manufacturers often use harmonized standards to prove conformity with the General Safety and Performance Requirements.
The MDR and IVDR also require compliance with so-called common specifications.
Tip
As a manufacturer, you must demonstrate conformity precisely and sentence by sentence. You can benefit from our checklists such as the MDR checklist.
3. Differences between MDD and MDR
The MDR and IVDR formulate the requirements more granularly than the MDD respectively the IVD did and have expanded them. In addition, the MDR and IVDR distinguish between the “General Safety and Performance Requirements” (Annex I) and the requirements and their verification in the technical documentation (Annex II).
Compared to the MDD, the MDR also explicitly sets out requirements for:
- IT security
- Devices containing medicinal products
- Devices containing tissues of human or animal origin
- Disposal
- Active implantable devices (which were not in the scope of the MDD)
- Devices intended to be used by lay persons
- Labeling
5. Support
Do you still have questions about the basic requirements for medical devices? Then, benefit from free micro-consulting.
The Johner Institute supports medical device manufacturers,
- to prove the requirements with lean technical documentation,
- to check this evidence before the review by a notified body to avoid problems with “approval,”
- prepare the QM system for audits.
Contact us! The Johner Institut team will be happy to assist you!
When notified bodies identify discrepancies in clinical evaluations, in many cases, these relate to the clinical endpoints. It is, therefore, essential for medical device manufacturers to specify the clinical endpoints precisely and to demonstrate that they have actually been achieved. This article explains what manufacturers should pay particular attention to. 1. Clinical endpoints: The basics…
Details
Medical devices must comply with the legal requirements for functional safety. Unfortunately, the relevant standards and laws for medical devices do not define or use the term “functional safety.” This article provides clarity. 1. Functional safety: The background a) Who has to deal with it? The following roles must understand the concepts of functional safety:…
Details
The terms maintenance, preventive maintenance, restoration, inspection, service, and safety inspections are not synonymous. But they all refer to activities in the life cycle of medical devices that serve the objective of ensuring the safety, performance, and effectiveness of these devices even after they have been placed on the market. Manufacturers and operators must meet…
Details
If manufacturers don’t conduct a legally compliant performance evaluation of their in vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD), they aren’t just running the risk of problems during the authorization process: They are risking patient safety. Therefore, the IVDR sets strict requirements for this performance evaluation. Find out how the requirements of the IVDR for the performance…
Details
Threat modeling is a “mandatory” topic for all manufacturers of medical devices that contain or are software. This is because threat modeling is a structured process for the systematic analysis of IT security risks that auditors consider to be the “state of the art.” 1. Why should you use threat modeling? Reason 1: To develop secure devices…
Details
IEC 60601-1 describes essential performance as performance necessary to achieve freedom from unacceptable risk. This article aims to explain what the standard means by that and how this essential performance differs from basic safety. The article also addresses the IEC 60601-1/AMD1/ISH1:2021 INTERPRETATION SHEET 1. 1. What is essential performance? a) Definition of the term Despite this definition, there are always…
Details
A lot of medical device manufacturers see the international authorization of their device as a potential hazard: the opportunities offered by new markets are offset by hard-to-calculate risks as well as the time and costs required for these authorizations. The five steps presented in this article will help manufacturers to manage these risks better. And this is…
Details
What a lot of people understand by accessories is different from the definition of the term in the German Medical Device Act (MPG). This article gives you an overview of the definition of the term, the regulatory requirements, and typical questions. 1. Definition of the term “accessory” a) Accessory according to the MPG and MDD…
Details
The parameterization of software – in this context, we can also talk about customizing or configuring software – often leads to discussion, e.g., regarding responsibilities and the differentiation to in-house production. This article gives manufacturers and their customers important advice on what to look out for when parameterizing software and how to avoid the usual pitfalls.…
Details
Unannounced audits are random sampling checks of the quality management systems by notified bodies with the aim of Initial experience with unannounced audits is now available. Update: Changes due to the MDR History of unannounced audits The emphasis on unannounced audits is a result of the breast implant scandal, after which the demand emerged to…
Details