The EU medical device regulations (MDR and IVDR) refer to the requirements that every medical device must meet as General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR).
The previous Medical Device Directive (MDD) referred to the “general requirements”.
Content
On this page, you will find references to relevant articles.
- Examples of General Safety and Performance Requirements
- Proof of the General Safety and Performance Requirements
- Differences between the requirements of the MDR and the MDD
- Support in demonstrating these requirements
1. Examples of General Safety and Performance Requirements
The MDR and IVDR list the General Safety and Performance Requirements in their respective Annexes I. Examples of GSPR are:
Note
The GSPR do not depend on the class of the medical device.
2. Proof of the general requirements
The manufacturers themselves provide proof that the medical devices meet these general requirements as part of a conformity assessment procedure. Depending on this conformity assessment procedure, they have to involve notified bodies.
Manufacturers often use harmonized standards to prove conformity with the General Safety and Performance Requirements.
The MDR and IVDR also require compliance with so-called common specifications.
Tip
As a manufacturer, you must demonstrate conformity precisely and sentence by sentence. You can benefit from our checklists such as the MDR checklist.
3. Differences between MDD and MDR
The MDR and IVDR formulate the requirements more granularly than the MDD respectively the IVD did and have expanded them. In addition, the MDR and IVDR distinguish between the “General Safety and Performance Requirements” (Annex I) and the requirements and their verification in the technical documentation (Annex II).
Compared to the MDD, the MDR also explicitly sets out requirements for:
- IT security
- Devices containing medicinal products
- Devices containing tissues of human or animal origin
- Disposal
- Active implantable devices (which were not in the scope of the MDD)
- Devices intended to be used by lay persons
- Labeling
5. Support
Do you still have questions about the basic requirements for medical devices? Then, benefit from free micro-consulting.
The Johner Institute supports medical device manufacturers,
- to prove the requirements with lean technical documentation,
- to check this evidence before the review by a notified body to avoid problems with “approval,”
- prepare the QM system for audits.
Contact us! The Johner Institut team will be happy to assist you!
The EU regulations place high requirements on the so-called placing on the market of medical devices. Find out in this article what these regulations mean by placing on the market, what misunderstandings and contradictions you must be aware of, and what requirements manufacturers and devices must meet.
Details
Combination products consist of the combination of a medical device and a medicinal product. Since both medical device and medicinal product law could be applicable here, there are some special features that must be taken into account for products of this type. In this article, you learn more about
Details
In order to evaluate the biocompatibility of standard materials, medical device manufacturers can, in most cases, avoid animal testing. In recent years, the Johner Institute had always succeeded in showing alternatives to animal testing, even when authorities and notified bodies demanded them. Learn here how you can contribute to animal welfare, save money, and bring…
Details
Since May 25, 2017, the In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation (IVDR) has been in force, which has now replaced the previous IVD Directive (98/79/EC, IVDD). There are significant differences between the IVDR and IVDD. This article presents these differences. In doing so, it provides manufacturers who placed their devices under the EU directive (IVDD)…
Details
When notified bodies identify discrepancies in clinical evaluations, in many cases, these relate to the clinical endpoints. It is, therefore, essential for medical device manufacturers to specify the clinical endpoints precisely and to demonstrate that they have actually been achieved. This article explains what manufacturers should pay particular attention to.
Details
Medical devices must comply with the legal requirements for functional safety. Unfortunately, the relevant standards and laws for medical devices do not define or use the term “functional safety.” This article provides clarity.
Details
If manufacturers don’t conduct a legally compliant performance evaluation of their in vitro diagnostic medical device (IVD), they aren’t just running the risk of problems during the authorization process: They are risking patient safety. Therefore, the IVDR sets strict requirements for this performance evaluation. Find out how the requirements of the IVDR for the performance…
Details
Threat modeling is a “mandatory” topic for all manufacturers of medical devices that contain or are software. This is because threat modeling is a structured process for the systematic analysis of IT security risks that auditors consider to be the “state of the art.”
IEC 60601-1 describes essential performance as performance necessary to achieve freedom from unacceptable risk. This article aims to explain what the standard means by that and how this essential performance differs from basic safety. The article also addresses the IEC 60601-1/AMD1/ISH1:2021 INTERPRETATION SHEET 1.
Details
What a lot of people understand by accessories is different from the definition of the term in the German Medical Device Act (MPG). This article gives you an overview of the definition of the term, the regulatory requirements, and typical questions.
Details